Monatsarchiv: März 2010

End of an Era

How I’d have loved to write about the end of Volker Rehboldt’s time as the chairman of the board at 1. FC Magdeburg. But alas, it is the end of Steffen Baumgart’s time with the club instead.
Yesterday, the board had a meeting and apparently determined to send Baumgart on gardening leave, but also told the media they would not confirm this, because they wanted to tell „the affected party personally„. (Emphasis mine)
Well, today, Baumgart confirmed he was sacked when asked by several media outlets. Via the telephone, apparently.

This is just the last straw in a long row of ineptitude and incompetence put on display by the current board. It all began way back in 2007, when the board decided that the 1. FC Magdeburg squad was strong enough to reach tenth place in the following season. This led to the club signing exactly zero new forwards, although one of the team’s top scorers had left for a 2nd Bundesliga side. Of course, Magdeburg finished 11th, outranked on goal deficit by a mere three goals. New manager Paul Linz was then signed to reach the top spot in the 2008-09 season, with a budget that was arguably the largest in the league. Naturally, he failed and the team he had constructed was then taken over by Steffen Baumgart. I suppose a club with a notoriously over-expectant audience is not the best place to start a managing career, but as Baumgart himself pointed out, it was his choice. Well, Baumgart finished the season decently, winning the regional cup and thus qualifying for the DFB-Pokal. The league performance was somewhat poor though.

His contract was extended nevertheless, and several players that his predecessor had signed were let go, claiming they were „Stinkstiefel“ who poisoned the atmosphere at the club. Baumgart was given a number of new players, with some decent signings such as Denis Wolf or Lars Fuchs. However, Denis Wolf has only played about ten minutes of competitive football due to injuries, and several players were outright disappointments.
At the winter break, Magdeburg were ten points behind the coveted top spot, but Baumgart – and the players – were radiating confidence that they still could turn things around. As the other teams‘ results have shown, Magdeburg could have significantly reduced the deficit with a decent start. But it couldn’t have happened any other way – Magdeburg gained one point from five matches in 2010.

Of course, sacking the manager is now the logical consequence, you say? It would be, but if the chairman of the board keeps stating publicly that the team is a bunch of lazy sods who do not deserve to wear the shirt…and that in the 1-4 defeat at Hannover 96’s reserves „a characterless team had failed a decent manager“…
Then one has to wonder why the consequence is sacking the manager and allowing the team to continue.

The club are now looking for a new manager to pick things up from July 1, until then assistant manager and youth center boss Carsten Müller will be responsible. As Magdeburg are forced to reduce their budget by half a million Euros, it appears that nothing ever changes: No professional football in my home town.

Ewigkeit und Genauigkeit

Die Volksstimme berichtet heute, dass sich nach den Olympischen Winterspielen von Vancouver natürlich auch der Ewige Medaillenspiegel verändert hat. Neue Rangordnung laut Volksstimme: 1. Deutschland, 2. UdSSR/Rußl.

Liebe Freunde bei der Volksstimme. Es ist richtig, dass Rußland laut IOC Nachfolger der UdSSR ist und so deren Erfolge „erbt“. Aber wäre es nicht möglicherweise sinnvoll, zu erwähnen, dass Deutschland aus den Erfolgen aller deutschen Mannschaften besteht? (Andere machen das entweder so (ARD) oder so (Bild). Eine ganz verrückte Variante gibt’s beim Spiegel)) Also der Gesamtdeutschen Olympiamannschaften, der DDR und der BRD, wie hier in der Wikipedia schön aufgeschlüsselt? Mal davon abgesehen, dass zu Rußland auch das Vereinte Team (EUN) von Albertville 1992 gehört, als die GUS gemeinsam antraten.

Zur generellen Sinnhaftigkeit einer Tabelle, die einerseits ein aktuelles Land die Erfolge zweier Länder erben lässt und andererseits einem aktuellen Land, das lediglich einen Teil seines Vorgängers umfasst, alle Erfolge des Vorgängers zuspricht, muss wohl jeder eigene Überlegungen anstellen. Aber eigentlich gilt bei Olympia ja angeblich Mittendrin, statt nur dabei Dabei sein ist alles, insofern sollte diese Tabelle ja auch untergeordnete Priorität besitzen.